<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Long versus Short Copy Split Testing Results</title> <atom:link href="http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/2011/02/27/long-versus-short-copy-split-testing-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/2011/02/27/long-versus-short-copy-split-testing-results/</link> <description>Irreverence Rebellion and interweb marketing.  Sometimes with video thingies.</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 13:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: How to Design a Landing Page through Questions &#124; Wagggle Buzz</title><link>http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/2011/02/27/long-versus-short-copy-split-testing-results/#comment-14132</link> <dc:creator>How to Design a Landing Page through Questions &#124; Wagggle Buzz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:37:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/?p=978#comment-14132</guid> <description>[...] problem with this is I would be taking away the chance to do split-testing, and everyone knows how much a fan of split testing I am.&#160; Time and again I have proven how [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] problem with this is I would be taking away the chance to do split-testing, and everyone knows how much a fan of split testing I am.&nbsp; Time and again I have proven how [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andy</title><link>http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/2011/02/27/long-versus-short-copy-split-testing-results/#comment-10926</link> <dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 03:44:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/?p=978#comment-10926</guid> <description>Andy,
This is the first time I have seen a test of this type done. I haven&#039;t been trying my hand at internet marketing that long and I found this analysis very useful. Thanks for sharing it and updating it as well.
Derek</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy,</p><p>This is the first time I have seen a test of this type done. I haven&#8217;t been trying my hand at internet marketing that long and I found this analysis very useful. Thanks for sharing it and updating it as well.</p><p>Derek</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Short Copy vs. Long Copy: Getting More Response from Your Copywriting &#171; &#171; Your Wish Marketing Your Wish Marketing</title><link>http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/2011/02/27/long-versus-short-copy-split-testing-results/#comment-10892</link> <dc:creator>Short Copy vs. Long Copy: Getting More Response from Your Copywriting &#171; &#171; Your Wish Marketing Your Wish Marketing</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 01:29:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/?p=978#comment-10892</guid> <description>[...] Check out his test results and see for yourself: Andy Jenkins, Long vs. Short Copy Split Testing Results. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Check out his test results and see for yourself: Andy Jenkins, Long vs. Short Copy Split Testing Results. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mikeb</title><link>http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/2011/02/27/long-versus-short-copy-split-testing-results/#comment-8951</link> <dc:creator>mikeb</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 22:51:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/?p=978#comment-8951</guid> <description>Andy - had you considered the problem IS the bullets.
Blind bullets - that state the benefit, not the feature, but that is not what you did.
The bullets seem to say &quot;good headline, write second person, enhance with bullets etc etc&quot; just sounds like the usual yada yada yada, and the busy reader will think. Know that stuff, dont need to read it , and move on to the next.
On the other hand, for second person for example better might be..
&quot;The trick all top copywriters use to make you think that they are just talking to you - corporate websites just don&#039;t do this&quot;
or something.
The point is the bullets don&#039;t leave any mystery, which is what people make
I am far more likely to click if I saw bullets like.
&quot; One simple change to button text that made a 23% increase in sales!&quot;
I would love to see the results if you ran that test again but with good blind bullets. I think the long copy could win in that case.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy &#8211; had you considered the problem IS the bullets.</p><p>Blind bullets &#8211; that state the benefit, not the feature, but that is not what you did.</p><p>The bullets seem to say &#8220;good headline, write second person, enhance with bullets etc etc&#8221; just sounds like the usual yada yada yada, and the busy reader will think. Know that stuff, dont need to read it , and move on to the next.</p><p>On the other hand, for second person for example better might be..</p><p>&#8220;The trick all top copywriters use to make you think that they are just talking to you &#8211; corporate websites just don&#8217;t do this&#8221;</p><p>or something.</p><p>The point is the bullets don&#8217;t leave any mystery, which is what people make</p><p>I am far more likely to click if I saw bullets like.<br
/> &#8221; One simple change to button text that made a 23% increase in sales!&#8221;</p><p>I would love to see the results if you ran that test again but with good blind bullets. I think the long copy could win in that case.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: dallmeier</title><link>http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/2011/02/27/long-versus-short-copy-split-testing-results/#comment-8946</link> <dc:creator>dallmeier</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 19:43:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/?p=978#comment-8946</guid> <description>I love to share new info and this is new for me thanks for giving some thing this is simple but informative thanks for this one.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love to share new info and this is new for me thanks for giving some thing this is simple but informative thanks for this one.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Simon James</title><link>http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/2011/02/27/long-versus-short-copy-split-testing-results/#comment-8790</link> <dc:creator>Simon James</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 07:00:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/?p=978#comment-8790</guid> <description>If you actually had something to sell, it would be interesting to know the final conversion rate of people who clicked through, having already read the bullets, versus those who hadn&#039;t.
Also, I would like to see more tests as to whether the &quot;full stop&quot; result was actually statistically significant, or just a minor variance due to the small sample population.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you actually had something to sell, it would be interesting to know the final conversion rate of people who clicked through, having already read the bullets, versus those who hadn&#8217;t.</p><p>Also, I would like to see more tests as to whether the &#8220;full stop&#8221; result was actually statistically significant, or just a minor variance due to the small sample population.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Viktoria Grace</title><link>http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/2011/02/27/long-versus-short-copy-split-testing-results/#comment-8556</link> <dc:creator>Viktoria Grace</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 02:07:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/?p=978#comment-8556</guid> <description>Higher conversions AND I have to write less?  Sweet.  I hope this proves to be true.  Thanks for the read.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Higher conversions AND I have to write less?  Sweet.  I hope this proves to be true.  Thanks for the read.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Allen Walker</title><link>http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/2011/02/27/long-versus-short-copy-split-testing-results/#comment-8381</link> <dc:creator>Allen Walker</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 20:04:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/?p=978#comment-8381</guid> <description>Thanks a lot for the great information, Andy. :)
Definitely some things I will keep in mind when sending out my next email...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot for the great information, Andy. <img
src='http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>Definitely some things I will keep in mind when sending out my next email&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Geegeez Matt</title><link>http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/2011/02/27/long-versus-short-copy-split-testing-results/#comment-8184</link> <dc:creator>Geegeez Matt</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 17:06:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/?p=978#comment-8184</guid> <description>I&#039;ve test long and short; with images and plain text; different headline ideas... and my findings are that headlines are uniform - they must always compel the reader to open, of course.
With the body copy though, there&#039;s a time and place for brevity and it usually is not when I&#039;m offering something to buy. Rather, it&#039;s when I&#039;m randomly pontificating about some element of UK horse racing or other such immaterial detritus.
Interesting test, all the same, Andy. And yes, I&#039;ll look forward to the insights on &#039;pattern interrupt&#039;, which is a cool technique for demanding attention!
Best,
Matt</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve test long and short; with images and plain text; different headline ideas&#8230; and my findings are that headlines are uniform &#8211; they must always compel the reader to open, of course.</p><p>With the body copy though, there&#8217;s a time and place for brevity and it usually is not when I&#8217;m offering something to buy. Rather, it&#8217;s when I&#8217;m randomly pontificating about some element of UK horse racing or other such immaterial detritus.</p><p>Interesting test, all the same, Andy. And yes, I&#8217;ll look forward to the insights on &#8216;pattern interrupt&#8217;, which is a cool technique for demanding attention!</p><p>Best,<br
/> Matt</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tom</title><link>http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/2011/02/27/long-versus-short-copy-split-testing-results/#comment-8124</link> <dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:41:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/?p=978#comment-8124</guid> <description>Good insights Andy...I opened because of you..clicked because of you and I was interested in the headline topic...did not read much text in email.. Short presentations are better for me..... after into subject, then I will read more.  Read your evaluation above...Must confess...I like the video with  Led Zeppelin’s “Immigrant Song” the most.  Data is needed, but I could sign along with the video.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good insights Andy&#8230;I opened because of you..clicked because of you and I was interested in the headline topic&#8230;did not read much text in email.. Short presentations are better for me&#8230;.. after into subject, then I will read more.  Read your evaluation above&#8230;Must confess&#8230;I like the video with  Led Zeppelin’s “Immigrant Song” the most.  Data is needed, but I could sign along with the video.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
