<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Duplicate Content on your site</title> <atom:link href="http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/2009/10/12/duplicate-content-on-your-site/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/2009/10/12/duplicate-content-on-your-site/</link> <description>Irreverence Rebellion and interweb marketing.  Sometimes with video thingies.</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 13:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Nicole Smith</title><link>http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/2009/10/12/duplicate-content-on-your-site/#comment-9167</link> <dc:creator>Nicole Smith</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 07:03:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/?p=403#comment-9167</guid> <description>Just to tell you that i am very happy to see your succeed. My online bussines and my life are now very VERY good, thanks in part for your content and life example.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to tell you that i am very happy to see your succeed. My online bussines and my life are now very VERY good, thanks in part for your content and life example.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Art Martin</title><link>http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/2009/10/12/duplicate-content-on-your-site/#comment-3341</link> <dc:creator>Art Martin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:16:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/?p=403#comment-3341</guid> <description>Andy
I agree in general to what you are quoting in your recent email.  Yet there are
exceptions to the case.
Most people are single trackers. Give them more than one task it fouls up their brains ability to function and overwhelms them
I have been working in the field of NeuroPsychology for 25 years.
People who are right brain oriented can function with multiple tasking
without problems.  The right brain functions digitally in in pictures instead of linear analog processing.  Left brain functions at about 34 bits per second while the right brain functions at 240,000 bit per second.
This explains why people can photo read a book in 30 minutes to two hours where the average person may take up to 24 to 40 hours to read the same book.
Granted we can accomplish more single tasking.  I have discovered many exceptions to the case.
Art Martin Ph.D.
-</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy<br
/> I agree in general to what you are quoting in your recent email.  Yet there are<br
/> exceptions to the case.<br
/> Most people are single trackers. Give them more than one task it fouls up their brains ability to function and overwhelms them<br
/> I have been working in the field of NeuroPsychology for 25 years.<br
/> People who are right brain oriented can function with multiple tasking<br
/> without problems.  The right brain functions digitally in in pictures instead of linear analog processing.  Left brain functions at about 34 bits per second while the right brain functions at 240,000 bit per second.<br
/> This explains why people can photo read a book in 30 minutes to two hours where the average person may take up to 24 to 40 hours to read the same book.<br
/> Granted we can accomplish more single tasking.  I have discovered many exceptions to the case.</p><p>Art Martin Ph.D.</p><p>-</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alex</title><link>http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/2009/10/12/duplicate-content-on-your-site/#comment-2084</link> <dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:13:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/?p=403#comment-2084</guid> <description>So if I syndicate my articles (that are also published on my website) I&#039;m shooting myself in the foot? Even if every syndicated article has a link to the original article on my website?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if I syndicate my articles (that are also published on my website) I&#8217;m shooting myself in the foot? Even if every syndicated article has a link to the original article on my website?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Greg</title><link>http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/2009/10/12/duplicate-content-on-your-site/#comment-1976</link> <dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 07:09:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/?p=403#comment-1976</guid> <description>Hi,
interesting ?
I have a site that knocked me out of #1 position on Google for my keyword a few weeks back. Only 7 articles on the blog and 5 were reprints from other authors. Also, this blog had 900 backlinks and 800 of them came from another blog of the same author ?
How does Google let that one slip by?
Greg</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br
/> interesting ?<br
/> I have a site that knocked me out of #1 position on Google for my keyword a few weeks back. Only 7 articles on the blog and 5 were reprints from other authors. Also, this blog had 900 backlinks and 800 of them came from another blog of the same author ?<br
/> How does Google let that one slip by?<br
/> Greg</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Doris Bentz</title><link>http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/2009/10/12/duplicate-content-on-your-site/#comment-1744</link> <dc:creator>Doris Bentz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 00:07:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/?p=403#comment-1744</guid> <description>Wow &quot;expression engine&quot; sounds very sophisticated, can you tell me where one can learn that? That is, if it&#039;s not too difficult.
Thanks,
Doris Bentz</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow &#8220;expression engine&#8221; sounds very sophisticated, can you tell me where one can learn that? That is, if it&#8217;s not too difficult.</p><p>Thanks,</p><p>Doris Bentz</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Boris</title><link>http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/2009/10/12/duplicate-content-on-your-site/#comment-1743</link> <dc:creator>Boris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/?p=403#comment-1743</guid> <description>Good stuff as always.
One way to deal with templates and duplicate content is to create editable regions in some parts of your templates. I do it in Dreaweaver where in places like right navigation column, I create a couple of small editable regions where I change links a bit or place a paragraph or two of related content to the topic of the page.
This of course has nothing to do with the left column where the original content/article is. It is always original.
As I look closely at Google&#039;s updates, I notice one trend. They don&#039;t like people to automate tasks related to content creation or SEO. It has to be &quot;hand made&quot;. Of course, they don&#039;t mind using streamlined processes themselves.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff as always.<br
/> One way to deal with templates and duplicate content is to create editable regions in some parts of your templates. I do it in Dreaweaver where in places like right navigation column, I create a couple of small editable regions where I change links a bit or place a paragraph or two of related content to the topic of the page.<br
/> This of course has nothing to do with the left column where the original content/article is. It is always original.<br
/> As I look closely at Google&#8217;s updates, I notice one trend. They don&#8217;t like people to automate tasks related to content creation or SEO. It has to be &#8220;hand made&#8221;. Of course, they don&#8217;t mind using streamlined processes themselves.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dan Thies</title><link>http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/2009/10/12/duplicate-content-on-your-site/#comment-1737</link> <dc:creator>Dan Thies</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 16:28:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/?p=403#comment-1737</guid> <description>We&#039;re talking about observable effects here... most likely (some) article directories have a great deal of authority because of inbound links. Not sure what kind of competitive SERPs you&#039;re seeing where article databases are ranking especially well.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re talking about observable effects here&#8230; most likely (some) article directories have a great deal of authority because of inbound links. Not sure what kind of competitive SERPs you&#8217;re seeing where article databases are ranking especially well.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jack B</title><link>http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/2009/10/12/duplicate-content-on-your-site/#comment-1731</link> <dc:creator>Jack B</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 16:35:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/?p=403#comment-1731</guid> <description>Always great information.  Someone has to steer us around all the google holes on the net.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always great information.  Someone has to steer us around all the google holes on the net.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dan</title><link>http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/2009/10/12/duplicate-content-on-your-site/#comment-1724</link> <dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 02:36:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/?p=403#comment-1724</guid> <description>If Google punishes duplicate content as you guys say, then why do the major article directories that are filled with duplicate content rank so high in Google?
Can someone explain this to me clearly?
Thanks</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Google punishes duplicate content as you guys say, then why do the major article directories that are filled with duplicate content rank so high in Google?</p><p>Can someone explain this to me clearly?</p><p>Thanks</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mike</title><link>http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/2009/10/12/duplicate-content-on-your-site/#comment-1451</link> <dc:creator>mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:09:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyjenkinsblog.com/?p=403#comment-1451</guid> <description>As always, great information that can be put to use right now. Time to tweak some pages.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As always, great information that can be put to use right now. Time to tweak some pages.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
